ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Prüfungsinformationen - ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Vorbereitungsfragen

Was Wir Ihnen bieten sind, die neuesten und die umfassendesten Test-Bank von PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor, die risikolose Kaufgarantie und die rechtzeitige Aktualisierung der PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor. Sie werden sich beim Kauf unbesorgt fühlen, indem Sie die Demo unserer Software kostenlos zu probieren. Die einjährige kostenfreie Aktualisierung der PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor erleichtern Ihre Sorgen bei der Prüfungsvorbereitung. Was wir am meisten garantieren ist, dass unsere Software vielen Prüfungsteilnehmern bei der Zertifizierung der PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor geholfen hat.

Es ist uns allen bekannt, dass IT-Branche eine neue Branche und auch eine Kette ist, die die wirtschaftliche Entwicklung fördert. So ist ihre Position nicht zu ignorieren. Die PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor IT-Zertifizierung ist eine Methode für den Wettbewerb. Durch die PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Zertifizierung werden Sie sich in allen Aspekten verbessern. Aber es ist nicht so einfach, die Prüfung zu bestehen. So empfehle ich Ihnen unsere originale Fragen. Wenn Sie die Schulungsressourcen wählen, ist ExamFragen die erste Wahl. Seine Erfolgsquote beträgt 100%. Und Sie können die PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Prüfung sicher bestehen.

>> ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Prüfungsinformationen <<

ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Vorbereitungsfragen - ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Testantworten

Viele IT-Fachleute wollen die PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Zertifizierungsprüfung bestehen, so dass sie im IT-Branche befördert, ihre Lebensverhältnisse verbessert und ihr Gehalt erhöht werden.Viele Leute haben viel Zeit und Energie für die PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Zertifizierungsprüfung verwendet, trotzdem fallen sie in der Prüfung durch. Es ist gar nicht kostengünstig. Wenn Sie ExamFragen wählen, können Sie viel Zeit und Energie ersparen und zwar die PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Prüfung erfolgreich bestehen. Denn die zielgerichteten Prüfungsmaterialien wird Ihnen helfen, die Prüfung 100% zu bestehen. Falls Sie in der PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Prüfung durchfallen, zahlen wir Ihnen die gesammte Summe zurück.

PECB QMS ISO 9001:2015 Lead Auditor Exam ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Prüfungsfragen mit Lösungen (Q135-Q140):

135. Frage
A Health Trust has contracted with Servitup, a catering services organisation which has been certified to ISO
9001 for 1 year. It provides services to ten, small rural
hospitals in remote locations involving purchase and storage of dry goods and fresh produce, preparing meals and loading heated trolleys for ward service by hospital staff. An auditor is conducting the first sole surveillance audit at one site with the Deputy Catering Manager (DCM).
At the closing meeting attended solely by the DCM, the auditor informs him that he has found numerous gaps in the QMS processes which lead him to consider recommending suspension of the organisation's certification. He is particularly concerned with the evidence that patient health is being adversely affected by produce stored beyond its safe consumption date, poor kitchen hygiene and undercooked meals. The DCM says that he cannot make any decisions about these issues in the absence of the Catering Manager due to illness but will write everything down and report to the Catering Manager.
Which two actions should you take in the context of the audit?

A. Recommend that all personnel should be given urgent in-depth training in the QMS.
B. Thank the DCM for his time and express an expectation that improvements will be made in the QMS.
C. Call the individual(s) managing the audit programme to explain the situation and recommend immediate suspension of certification to protect the integrity of the Certification Body.
D. Conclude the meeting early and advise that it will be rescheduled once the Catering Manager has returned to work.
E. Close the meeting immediately after the DCM's response and advise that the issues will be addressed at the next surveillance visit.
F. Continue with the meeting, present the audit conclusions and inform the DCM that the organisation will receive the audit report in due course.

Antwort: C,F

Begründung:
The actions that should be taken in the context of the audit are:
*Option B: Call the individual(s) managing the audit programme to explain the situation and recommend immediate suspension of certification to protect the integrity of the Certification Body. This option is correct because the auditor has found serious and significant gaps in the QMS processes that affect the health and safety of the patients, which is a major nonconformity that may warrant suspension of certification. The auditor should inform the individual(s) managing the audit programme of the situation and the audit findings, and recommend immediate suspension of certification to protect the integrity of the Certification Body and the credibility of the certification scheme. The auditor should also follow the Certification Body's procedures and rules for suspension of certification and communicate the decision and the consequences to the auditee.
*Option C: Continue with the meeting, present the audit conclusions and inform the DCM that the organisation will receive the audit report in due course. This option is correct because the auditor should not terminate or postpone the closing meeting due to the absence of the Catering Manager, as the DCM is the auditee's nominated representative for the audit. The auditor should continue with the meeting, present the audit conclusions and the audit findings, and inform the DCM that the organisation will receive the audit report in due course. The auditor should also explain the audit outcome recommendation and the suspension of certification, and request the DCM to acknowledge the receipt and understanding of the audit results.
The following options are not correct:
*Option A: Close the meeting immediately after the DCM's response and advise that the issues will be addressed at the next surveillance visit. This option is not correct because the auditor should not close the meeting without presenting the audit conclusions and the audit findings, as this would violate the audit principles of fairness and transparency. The auditor should also not advise that the issues will be addressed at the next surveillance visit, as this would imply that the auditor is accepting the auditee's delay and inaction, and that the auditor is not taking the major nonconformity seriously.
*Option D: Conclude the meeting early and advise that it will be rescheduled once the Catering Manager has returned to work. This option is not correct because the auditor should not conclude the meeting early or reschedule it due to the absence of the Catering Manager, as this would disrupt the audit process and the audit schedule. The auditor should also not wait for the Catering Manager to return to work, as this would delay the communication and resolution of the major nonconformity, and potentially compromise the health and safety of the patients.
*Option E: Recommend that all personnel should be given urgent in-depth training in the QMS. This option is not correct because the auditor should not recommend or prescribe specific corrective actions to the auditee, as this would violate the audit principles of independence and objectivity. The auditor should only report the audit findings and the audit outcome recommendation, and leave the responsibility and authority for determining and implementing the corrective actions to the auditee.
*Option F: Thank the DCM for his time and express an expectation that improvements will be made in the QMS. This option is not correct because the auditor should not thank the DCM for his time and express an expectation that improvements will be made in the QMS, as this would imply that the auditor is satisfied and optimistic with the auditee's performance and response, and that the auditor is not taking the major nonconformity seriously. The auditor should instead express the concern and dissatisfaction with the auditee's QMS processes and the impact on the health and safety of the patients, and communicate the suspension of certification and the need for urgent and effective corrective actions.
References:
*ISO 19011:2018 Guidelines for auditing management systems, Clause 6.4.2: Conducting audit activities, Subclause k) and l)
*ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Course Material, Module 5: Conducting an Audit, Slide 20: Closing Meeting
*ISO 9001 Lead Auditor Training Course - IRCA Certified, Section 5.5: Closing Meeting
*Lead Auditor Exam Preparation Guide (EPG) Template - PECB, Section 3.2: Exam Content Outline, Subsection 3.2.1: Section 1 - Audit Fundamentals, Subsection 3.2.2: Section 2 - Audit Principles, Subsection
3.2.3: Section 3 - Audit Process, Subsection 3.2.4: Section 4 - Audit Competencies

136. Frage
You, as auditor, are in dialogue with the quality lead and managing director of a small business that supplies specialist laboratory equipment and furniture.
You: "I'd like to look at how you manage change in the organisation. What changes have you made as a business, say, over the last 12 months?" Auditee: "We have made some strategic changes, the main one being that we no longer manufacture our own products in house." You: "That sounds like quite a significant change. What has been the impact of that?" Auditee: "We now mainly sell other manufacturers' products, under their brand names, and have outsourced manufacture of our own brand products to one of our suppliers. Unfortunately, we had to make six members of our staff redundant. This represents about 20% of our workforce, so this has been quite a challenging time." You: "I'm sure. What were the reasons for making the change?" Auditee: "Our manufacturing section was a small operation, and we struggled to cope with fluctuations in demand. During busy periods, we found it hard to meet lead times, and in quiet periods we had staff with little to do. This was having an impact on customer satisfaction and meant we had to charge premium prices that made our product uncompetitive." You: "How did you go about the change?" The auditor asks to speak to the purchasing manager about the selection of the subcontractor to manufacture the company's own brand products.
You: "How did you choose a supplier to manufacture your products?"
Auditee: "We have had a long-term relationship with a supplier ABC Ltd - we gave them our design drawings, got them to complete a supplier questionnaire and run a couple of trial batches for us. We were happy with the result and we have used them ever since." ISO 9001:2015, clause 8.4.1 outlines situations when controls need to be applied to externally provided processes, products and services. Which one of the following situations is applicable to this scenario?

A. A process or part of a process is provided by an external provider as a result of a decision by the organisation.
B. Products and services for which the customer(s) supplies materials
C. Raw materials from external providers are intended for incorporation into the organisation's own products.
D. Products and services are provided directly to the customer(s) by external providers on behalf of the organisation.

Antwort: A

Begründung:
According to the ISO 9001:2015 standard, clause 8.4.1 requires organizations to ensure that externally provided processes, products and services conform to requirements. Controls must be applied to externally provided processes, products and services when:
The products and services are intended for incorporation into the organization's own products and services.
They are provided directly to customers by the external provider on behalf of the organization.
A process, or part of a process, is provided by an external provider as a result of a decision by the organization.
In this scenario, the auditee has chosen a supplier to manufacture their own brand products based on their design drawings, supplier questionnaire and trial batches. This means that the supplier is providing a process (manufacturing) as a result of a decision by the organization (the auditee). Therefore, clause 8.4.1 applies to this situation.

137. Frage
Scenario 7: POLKA is a car manufacturing company based in Stockholm, Sweden. The company has around 14,000 employees working in different sectors which help with the design, painting, assembling, and test drives of the final product. The company is widely known for its qualitative products and affordable prices. In order to retain their reputation, POLKA implemented a quality management system (QMS) based on ISO 9001.
Before applying for certification, the company decided to conduct an internal audit to check whether there are any nonconformities in their QMS and if the requirements of ISO 9001 are being fulfilled.
The top management appointed Sean, the internal auditor, as the team leader of the internal audit team. Sean required from the top management to have unrestricted access to the employees and executives of POLKA and to the documented information. Furthermore, Sean required to establish a team with a large number of auditors, considering the size and the complexity of the organization. The top management of POLKA agreed with Sean's requirements.
The top management, in cooperation with Sean, assigned 10 more employees to the audit team.
Following that. Sean planned the audit activities and assigned the roles and responsibilities to each auditor. They began by interviewing employees of different manufacturing departments to check whether they are aware of the process of the QMS implementation. While conducting these activities, one of the auditors asked Sean for permission to audit the department in which he worked on a daily basis, as he was very familiar with the processes of the department.
Along the way, the teams findings showed that the staff were trained, documented information was updated, and the QMS fulfilled the requirements of ISO 9001. The internal audit took three weeks to complete, and on the last week the audit team held a final meeting The team shared their results and together drafted the audit report This report was submitted to the top management of the company. The report was maintained as documented information, and was available to the relevant interested parties.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
According to Scenario 7, one of the auditors requested permission from Sean to audit the department in which he worked on a daily basis. Should Sean grant the auditor permission?

A. Yes, but Sean himself must be present in every audit activity
B. Yes, Sean should grant the auditor permission
C. No, internal auditors should be independent of the processes being audited

Antwort: C

Begründung:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:ISO 19011:2018, Clause 5.1 (Impartiality) states that:
* Internal auditors must be independent of the processes they audit to ensure objectivity.
* Auditing one's own department introduces bias and is not permitted.
Thus, Sean must not allow the auditor to audit their own department.

138. Frage
Scenario 6: Davis Clinic (DC) is an American medical center focused on integrated health care. Since its establishment DC was committed to providing qualitative services for its clients, which is the reason why the company decided to implement a quality management system (QMS) based on ISO 9001. After a year of having an active QMS in place, DC applied for a certification audit.
A team of five auditors, from a well-known certification body, was selected to conduct the audit. Eva was appointed as the audit team leader. After three days of auditing, the team gathered to review and examine their findings. They also discussed the audit findings with DC's top management and then drafted the audit conclusions.
In the closing meeting, which was held between the audit team and the top management of DC. Eva presented two nonconformities that were detected during the audit. Eva stated that the company did not retain documented information regarding its outsourced services for an analysis laboratory and regarding the conducted management reviews. During the closing meeting, the audit team required from DCs top management to come up with corrective action plans within two weeks. Although the top management did not agree with the audit findings, the audit team insisted that the auditee must submit corrective actions within the given time frame in order for the audit activities to continue.
Once the action plans were evaluated, the audit team began preparing the audit report. Eva required from the team to provide accurate descriptions of the audit findings and the audit conclusions. The report was then distributed to all the interested parties involved in the audit, including the certification body Based on the report, the certification body together with Eva, as the audit team leader, made the certification decision.
Based on the scenario above, answer the following question:
Why is it important to discuss the audit findings with DC's top management prior to the closing meeting and the submission of the final audit report?

A. To encourage the implementation of corrective actions as soon as possible
B. To verify whether the audit objectives have been met
C. To identify the persons responsible for the nonconformities

Antwort: B

Begründung:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:
Discussing audit findings before the closing meeting ensures that:
* The audit objectives have been met (ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.4.10).
* The auditee has an opportunity to clarify misunderstandings or provide additional evidence.
* The audit team and the auditee agree on the accuracy of findings before finalizing the report.
While encouraging corrective actions (B) is beneficial, the primary purpose of discussing findings is to ensure that the audit was conducted effectively and aligned with objectives. Identifying responsible persons (C) is not the auditor's role.
Reference:
ISO 19011:2018, Clause 6.4.10 (Communicating Audit Findings Before the Closing Meeting)

139. Frage
Scenario 5: Mechanical-Electro (ME) Audit Stages
Mechanical-Electro, better known as ME, is an American company that provides mechanical and electrical services in China. Their services range from air-conditioning systems, ventilation systems, plumbing, to installation of electrical equipment in automobile plants, electronic manufacturing facilities, and food processing plants.
Due to the fierce competition from local Chinese companies and failing to meet customer requirements, ME's revenue dropped significantly. In addition, customers' trust and confidence in the company decreased, and the reputation of the company was damaged.
In light of these developments, the top management of ME decided to implement a quality management system (QMS) based on ISO 9001. After having an effective QMS in place for over a year, they applied for a certification audit.
A team of four auditors was appointed for the audit, including Li Na as the audit team leader. Initially, the audit team conducted a general review of ME's documents, including the quality policy, operational procedures, inventory lists, QMS scope, process documentation, training records, and previous audit reports.
Li Na stated that this would allow the team to maintain a systematic and structured approach to gathering documents for all audit stages. While reviewing the documented information, the team observed some minor issues but did not identify any major nonconformities. Therefore, Li Na claimed that it was not necessary to prepare a report or conduct a meeting with ME's representatives at that stage of the audit. She stated that all areas of concern would be discussed in the next phase of the audit.
Following the on-site activities and the opening meeting with ME's top management, the audit team structured an audit test plan to verify whether ME's QMS conformed to Clause 8.2.1 (Customer Communication) of ISO 9001.
To do so, they gathered information through group interviews and sampling. Li Na conducted interviews with departmental managers in the first group and then with top management. In addition, she chose a sampling method that sufficiently represented customer complaints from both areas of ME' s operations.
The team members were responsible for the sampling procedure. They selected a sample size of 4 out of
45 customer complaints received weekly for electrical services and 2 out of 10 complaints for mechanical services.
Afterward, the audit team evaluated the evidence against the audit criteria and generated the audit findings.
According to general principles of sampling procedure, did the audit team select a valid sample for electrical services?

A. No, the selected sample size is low compared to the population, as for a population from 13 to 52 the minimum sample size should be 5.
B. No, the selected sample size is high compared to the population, as for a population from 13 to 52 the minimum sample size should be 10.
C. Yes, the selected sample size is proportionate to the population.

Antwort: A

Begründung:
Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation:The audit team selected 4 out of 45 customer complaints for electrical services, which is too low based on standard statistical sampling methods.
According to ISO 19011:2018 (Guidelines for Auditing Management Systems), for a population size between 13 and 52, a minimum sample size should be 5 to achieve a reasonable level of confidence.
This means the selected sample (4 complaints) was insufficient and did not align with standard sampling procedures. Therefore, the correct answer is A.

140. Frage
......

PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Zertifizierungsprüfung ist heute sehr populär. Wollen Sie an der ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Prüfung teilnehmen? Tatsächlich ist diese Prüfung sehr schwierig. Aber es bedeutet nicht, diese Prüfung mit guter Note sehr leicht zu bestehen. So, wissen Sie den kürzesten Weg zum Erfolg? Das ist natürlich die ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Dumps von ExamFragen.

ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Vorbereitungsfragen: https://www.examfragen.de/ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor-pruefung-fragen.html

Wenn Sie sich entscheiden, durch die PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Zertifizierungsprüfung sich zu verbessern, dann wählen doch ExamFragen, PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Prüfungsinformationen Wir sollen uns mit unseren Fähigkeiten beweisen, Sind Sie neugierig, warum so viele Menschen die schwierige PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Prüfung bestehen können, Mit dem PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Zertifikat werden Ihr Gehalt, Ihre Stelle und auch Ihre Lebensverhältnisse verbessert werden.

Bezaubert saß ich, bezaubert suchte ich aus ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor der Westentasche meinen Bleistift hervor, suchte nach Papier, fand die Weinkarte vor mir liegen, drehte sie um und schrieb auf ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Prüfungsinformationen ihre Rückseite, schrieb Verse, die ich erst ändern Tags in meiner Tasche wiederfand.

PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor: QMS ISO 9001:2015 Lead Auditor Exam braindumps PDF & Testking echter Test

Er warf den Hörer auf die Gabel, als wollte er eine Gift- spinne abschütteln, Wenn Sie sich entscheiden, durch die PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Zertifizierungsprüfung sich zu verbessern, dann wählen doch ExamFragen.

Wir sollen uns mit unseren Fähigkeiten beweisen, Sind Sie neugierig, warum so viele Menschen die schwierige PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Prüfung bestehen können, Mit dem PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Zertifikat werden Ihr Gehalt, Ihre Stelle und auch Ihre Lebensverhältnisse verbessert werden.

Viel glück!

Leah Bennett Leah Bennett

Biography

ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Prüfungsinformationen - ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Vorbereitungsfragen

ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Vorbereitungsfragen - ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Testantworten

PECB QMS ISO 9001:2015 Lead Auditor Exam ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor Prüfungsfragen mit Lösungen (Q135-Q140):

PECB ISO-9001-Lead-Auditor: QMS ISO 9001:2015 Lead Auditor Exam braindumps PDF & Testking echter Test

Company

Useful Links

Popular Categories

Apple Store

Google Play